Allowed

Chimata Venkateswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC16 Jun 2023CRLP/3664/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to Accused No.5 in Criminal Petition No. 3664 of 2023, citing release of co-accused and absence of special adverse circumstances against him.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; petitioner released on personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for like sum, to appear once a week at police station till filing of charge sheet.

Chimata Venkateswara Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Bail and Remand | Andhra Pradesh HC (2023)

¶1

lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AI

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE ll^/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3664 OF 2023

¶5

Between :

¶6

Chimata Venkateswara Rao, S/o Amaraiah, aged about 35 years, Kamma, PI'tChikalapalem Village, Savalyapuram Mandal

¶7

Petitl-oner/Accused 5

¶8

AND

¶9

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by l'ts public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh, Amaravathi

¶10

RespondenVComp[ainant

¶11

Petition under section 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the cI'rCumStanCeS stated in the grounds filed in support of the criminal Petition, the High Court may be Pleased tO release the petitioner/ Accused no.5 on bail I'n Crime no.45/2022, dated 03-08-2022 of PS Savalyapuram, Guntur District.

¶12

COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: SMT. SRIDEVI JAMPANI COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT.I PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THE CORT MADE THE FOLLOWING

¶13

ORDER:

¶14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH: AMARAVATI I THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶15

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No. 3664 of 2023}

¶16

ORAL ORDER:

¶17

Heard Sri D.Koteswara Rao, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Ms.Jampani Sridevi, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner/Accused No.5 and Sri Soora Venkata Sai Nath, Ld. Special Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶18

Sri D.Koteswara Rao, Ld. Counsel appearing for the petitioner/Accused No.5 has drawn the attention Of this court to various orders passed by this Court granting Bail in respect of Accused Nos.7 a 8. Ld. Counsel appearing for the petitioner/Accused No.5 also submits that in respect of Accused No.2 a coordinate Bench of this Honfole Court was pleased to grant Bail today. Presently this Bail Application is filed by the Accused No.5.

¶19

In view of the fact that Several Accused (Accused Nos.2, 7 a 8) I-n the same case bearing FIR No.45 of 2022, dated O3.08.2O23 has been granted Bail and that no special adverse circumstances have been pointed out by/

¶20

the prosecution as against the Present Applicant, this -+ _ J'l? |J.LJt court is inclined to grant Bail to the petitioner/Accused No.5 with the following conditions.\T I-

¶21

The petitioner/Accused No.5 herein shall be released on ball on his executing a personal bond for Rs.IO,OOO/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Ld. Judicial Magistrate of First class, vlnukonda, Guntur District.

¶22

on release, the petitioner/Accused No.5 shall ==np:=_^Jbe_fore _ the stale House--~of-;:c=: concerned once in a week i.e. on every Friday between 10.00 a.m. and o1.OO p.m., till filing of the charge sheet.

¶23

Accordingly, the criminal petition js allowed.

¶24

To,

¶25

//TRUE COPY//

¶26

Sd/-N.NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/a ,,,

¶27

Fo SECTION _QEFI.QE.B

¶28

The Judl'cI'al Magistrate of First class, VI-nukonda, Guntur DjstrI'Ct.

¶29

The StlpeFintendent, Vinukonda Jal'l. 3. TheO Tl__ -I I .Istation House off,'cer, ps savalyapuram, Guntur Djstrl'ct.___ -- --\Z^||® 4. One cc to SMT. SRIDEVI JAMPANI Advocate [opuc]_ . _ , . v, I,,,I A,l ^uvucale [ulJUL] Two coCC s t n o p llhI,'^ Dublic P r osecutor, High court of A.P. [OUT]^^..1_ I ,I One Spare 'copy

I., .`

REffiREE±+ __

HIGH COURT

GRKPJ

DATED : 16/06/2023

BAIL ORDER

CRLP.No.3664 of 2023

ETET 16JUNsoP

Chimata Venkateswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chimata Venkateswara Rao v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A Venkatesh Vs S Suresh Kumar

M.Seshanna, Vs Prl.Secy., Food and Consumer Affairs Dept.,Hyd., and 2 Others

B.Veeresh Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Duggempudi Yogeswara Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sri.M.Subba Reddy Vs the State of Ap.,Food and Consumer Affairs and 4 Others

Smt Bommisetti Bhavani Vs State of Ap