The writ petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners despite multiple adjournments and postings for dismissal. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.23489 of 2017
ORDER:
Inspite of several adjournments, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even today also, when the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the writ petition.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 16.03.2022 ssp
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.23489 of 2017
Dated:16.03.2022
ssp
Petitioners
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
