The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent developments. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, were also noted to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.23213 of 2016
ORDER:
It is represented that the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent of developments.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
4th November, 2022 Js.
RRR,J 2 W.P.No.23213 of 2016
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
W.P.No.23213 of 2016
4th November, 2022
Js.
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
