Single judge closed the contempt case as compliance had been made, closing any related pending petitions without costs.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.2156 of 2022
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the orders of the Court have been complied with.
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
03.11.2022 MJA
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.2156 of 2022
03.11.2022
MJA
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
