The court held the contempt case closed as respondents complied with directions to remove mud from a tank, noting no order on costs and closing any pending petitions.
Contempt case closed; no order on costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1539 of 2022
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing the rejoinder, the respondents have complied with the directions of this Court and have removed the mud in the tank.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
03.11.2022 MJA
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1539 of 2022
03.11.2022
MJA
R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
