The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had sought liberty to avail other legal remedies.
Petitioner granted liberty to avail other remedies available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.20748 OF 2022
Nathala Suguna Rao … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Energy and others. … Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.V.R.Manepalli Counsel for R1 : Government Pleader for Energy Counsel for R2 & R3 : Mr. M.Vidya Sagar, Standing Counsel for VTPS Counsel for R4 : Mr.Chennakeshavulu, Standing Counsel for C.B.I.
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time, sought liberty to avail the other remedies available in Law.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn
granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedies available in Law.
No orders as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall
stand closed.
_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J
July 20th , 2022.
BLV
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.20748 OF 2022
Dt: 20.07.2022
BLV
Nathala Suguna Rao
The State of Andhra Pradesh
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
