The court disposed of a contempt petition after the respondent bank submitted that it had complied with the previous order in the underlying writ petition, dismissing the case accordingly.
Contempt case closed; no costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.661 OF 2022
B.Chandra Naik … Petitioner
Versus
The Syndicate Bank, Rep.by its Chairman, Personnel Department (Staff Welfare) Head Office, Manipal, South Karnataka State and another. … Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.J.Sravan Kumar
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. T.B.L.Murthy
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank.
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents have complied with the Order dated 12.09.2019 in W.P.No.1339 of 2019 and therefore, no orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.
Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
Date: 19.07.2022 BLV
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CONTEMPT CASE No.661 of 2021
Date: 19-07-2022
BLV
B.Chandra Naik
The Syndicate Bank
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
