Respondent No.4 questioned about genuineness of the documents, more particularly, assignment and „No Objection Certificate‟ issued in favour of this petitioner for the first time in contempt case, challenging the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11590 of 2021 dated 22.06.2021. When once the order has attained finality, it is for Respondent No.4/Contemnor to implement the order. Instead of implementing the order in W.P.No.11590 of 2021 dated 22.06.2021 passed by this Court, the contemnor invented a different story that the documents are not genuine. Such plea is not open to the contemnor in a contempt case, as the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.11590 of 2021 has attained finality, since no appeal is preferred, thereby, Respondent No.4/contemnor is not entitled to raise such plea and issue an Endorsement in ROC.A/126/2021 dated 31.12.2021, in violation of the direction issued by this Court, deliberately knowing the ill-consequences that flow from such violation, as Respondent No.4/contemnor did not dispute the DKT patta granted in favour of this petitioner, so also „No Objection Certificate‟ at the earliest i.e.
