Dismissed¶15

Nem Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 11 Others

Allahabad HC18 Mar 2026WRIC/8093/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Nem Singh v. State of U.P.; Allahabad High Court; Prakash Padia, J.; WRIT - C No. 8093 of 2026; writ petition dismissed with cost; Section 67 U.P. Revenue Code 2006; Sub Divisional Officer Tehsil-Shikarpur Bulandshahar; order dated 29.12.2025; proceedings dropped; abadi land reserved for public purpose; illegal occupation; Writ C No. 5597 of 2025; no arguments raised; petition filed to harass private respondents; Registrar (Compliance); District Magistrate Bulandshahar; Naresh; March 19, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with cost. Registrar (Compliance) directed to communicate copy of the order to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Bulandshahar, who is further directed to communicate copy of the order to the private respondents namely Naresh and others on their residential address. ¶15

Nem Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 11 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 8093 of 2026

¶3

Nem Singh And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And 11 Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Chandra Sen Pal .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh

¶8

Court No. - 6

¶9

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

¶10

The order dated 29.12.2025 passed by the respondent no.3-Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil-Shikarpur, District Bulandshahar in the proceedings initiated under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is under challenge in the present writ petition. By the aforesaid order proceedings initiated against the private respondents was dropped. Aggrieved against the aforesaid petitioner has preferred present writ petition.

¶11

When a query was raised by this Court in respect of grounds on which basis present writ petition has been filed, counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon paragraph-10 of the writ petition, which is reproduced hereinbelow :-

¶12

"10. That since no action was taken against the private respondents for making illegal occupation of land reserved for public purpose in the abadi land, therefore, Petitioners approached this Hon'ble Court by means of writ C No. 5597 of 2025 (Nem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others)."

¶13

Apart from the same, no arguements whatsoever has been raised by the counsel for the petitioners.

¶14

In this view of the matter, the Court is of the opinion that present writ petition has been filed only in order to harass the private respondents.

¶15

In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed with cost.

¶16

WRIC No. 8093 of 2026

¶17

¶18

Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate copy of this order to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Bulandshahar within a weeks. The respondent no.2 is also directed to communicate copy of this order passed today to private respondents namely Naresh and others on their residential address.

¶19

(Prakash Padia,J.)

¶20

March 19, 2026

¶21

Pramod Tripathi

¶22

Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nem Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nem Singh and Another v. State of U.P. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Chandrapal Vs State of U.P. and 11 Others

Vijay Pal Singh and 54 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Muktar Vs A.D.C.

Reena Devi and Another Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Moiuddin Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Virendra Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 5 Others