Dismissed¶14

Chandrapal v. State of U.P. and 11 Others

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2026WRIC/7868/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, WRIT - C No. 7868 of 2026, decided March 18, 2026, Prakash Padia, J. Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking expeditious, time-bound disposal of Case No.8565 of 2025 (T202501010608565), Chandrapal vs. Baijnath and others, under Section 116, Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, pending before SDM, Tehsil Bah, District Agra. Petition dismissed: no extraordinary situation shown for a stipulated-period direction; court below expected to decide in accordance with law without unnecessary adjournments.

What did the court decide?

Nothing was stated in the petition, and no argument was made, showing any extraordinary situation warranting a direction to the court below to decide the case in a time-bound manner; accordingly the petition was dismissed. ¶14

Chandrapal Vs State of U.P. and 11 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 7868 of 2026

Chandrapal

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 11 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Uttar Kumar Goswami
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 6

¶9

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Respondent No.3 Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Bah, District Agrato decide the Case No.8565 of 2025, Computerized Case No.T202501010608565 (Chandrapal vs. Baijnath and others) under Section 116, Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.

¶12

From perusal of the record in transpires that immediately after filing of the aforesaid case, the petitioner appeared before this Court to decide the same, expeditiously.

¶13

Nothing has been stated in the entire petition that there is any extraordinary situation nor any arguments has been made in this regard by the learned counsel for the petitioner to direct the court below to decide the aforesaid case in a time bound manner.

¶14

In this view of the matter, present petition is dismissed .

¶15

However, court concerned is expected to decide the aforesaid case strictly in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties unless there is no legal impediment.

¶16

(Prakash Padia,J.)

¶17

March 18, 2026 Swati

¶18

Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrapal v. State of U.P. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrapal v. State of U.P. and 11 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Sushila Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajnath vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vijay Pal Singh vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Ram Jatan Vs D.D.C.and Others

Natthoo Singh and Others Vs D.D.C.and Others

Vinay Kumar Vs State of Up and 2 Others