Dismissed¶11

Vijay Pal Singh and 54 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

WRIT – C (Allahabad High Court, Prakash Padia, J., decided March 18, 2026)

Allahabad HC17 Mar 2026WRIC/5548/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; WRIT - C No. 5548 of 2026; Vijay Pal Singh And 54 Others v. State of U.P. and Another; Prakash Padia, J.; alternative remedy; Section 33 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; entry of legal heirs in revenue records; succession; representation dated 26.09.2025; District Magistrate Gautam Buddha Nagar; writ petition dismissed; decided March 18, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Entry of the petitioners' names in the revenue records on the basis of succession can only be granted to the petitioners as per Section 33 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. ¶9

Vijay Pal Singh and 54 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 5548 of 2026

¶3

Vijay Pal Singh And 54 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Girish Chandra Tripathi	Shukla, Kamlendra
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.
Court No.- 6

¶6

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

¶7

A prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner to direct the Respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Gautam Buddha Nagar/ record officer to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner dated 26.09.2025. In the aforesaid representation, a prayer has been made by the petitioners to enter the name of the petitioners as legal heirs of the deceased.

¶8

Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶9

After going through the records, it transpires that representation was submitted by the petitioners for entering their names in the revenue records on the basis of the succession. The aforesaid relief only be granted to the petitioners as per Section 33 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶10

In this view of the matter, the Court is of the opinion that relief as sought for could not be granted. In case, the petitioners want their names in the revenue record, they will move an application as provided under Section 33 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.

¶11

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative remedy.

¶12

(Prakash Padia,J.)

¶13

March 18, 2026/ Swati

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Pal Singh and 54 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Pal Singh and 54 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Sushila Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajnath vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vijay Pal Singh vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Ram Jatan Vs D.D.C.and Others

Natthoo Singh and Others Vs D.D.C.and Others

Vinay Kumar Vs State of Up and 2 Others