Dismissed¶15

Vipin Kumar Rathore v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026WRIA/6652/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WRIT - A No. 6652 of 2026, Allahabad High Court, Prakash Padia, J., decided May 5, 2026. Maintainability of writ petition; termination of outsourcing employee by Avani Paridhi Energy & Communication Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.4) by order dated 29.08.2025; termination order not challenged; petition challenging order dated 23.07.2025 of Deputy Director Agriculture, Pilibhit (respondent no.2) held not maintainable; writ petition dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail remedy against respondent no.4. No statute or precedent cited; no costs mentioned.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to avail the remedy available in law against respondent no.4. ¶15

Vipin Kumar Rathore Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 6652 of 2026

¶3

Vipin Kumar Rathore

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	....	.Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Akhiles Tiwari, Tiwari	h Kumar Rabindra
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶6

Court No. - 6

¶7

HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.

¶8

The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to quash the order dated 23.07.2025 passed by the respondent no.2-Deputy Director Agriculture, Pilibhit.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel placed before this Court the order dated 29.08.2025 passed by the respondent no.4 by which the services of the petitioner was terminated.

¶10

From perusal of the aforesaid, it is clear that petitioner was given the appointment by the respondent no.4-Managing Director/Authorized Signatory, Avani Paridhi Energy & Communication Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow as outsourcing employee and due to serious irregularities committed by the petitioner the decision in question has been taken. For the reasons best known to the petitioner the order dated 29.08.2025 issued by the respondent no.4 is not under challenge hence Court is of the opinion that present writ petition is not maintainable.

¶11

WRIA No. 6652 of 2026

¶12

¶13

At this point of time, a prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to avail the remedy, which is available in law against the respondent no.4.

¶14

Prayer made is allowed.

¶15

The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed.

¶16

May 5, 2026

¶17

Pramod Tripathi

¶18

(Prakash Padia,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vipin Kumar Rathore v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vipin Kumar Rathore v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Subhash Chandra @ Subhash Chandra Shakya vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Ram Babu Verma vs State of Up and 2 Others

Rajpal Singh vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shiv Shankar Richhariya Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sarita Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mathura Prasad Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others