Disposed¶13

Arif Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 May 2026NA529/2297/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedition direction under S. 529 BNSS; Allahabad High Court; applicant Arif Khan v. State of U.P.; Gangster Act case (S. 16(1), UP Gangsters and Anti-social Activities Act 1986), Case Crime No. 0195 of 2022, criminal misc. No. 113 of 2025 before Special Judge (DAA)/Gangster Act Hamirpur; property confiscation by District Magistrate Hamirpur; trial to conclude preferably within two months; no undue adjournments; application disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned trial court (Special Judge (DAA)/Gangster Act, Hamirpur) to decide criminal misc. No. 113 of 2025 expeditiously, preferably within two months from production of certified copy of the order, without permitting undue adjournments, subject to there being no legal hurdle. ¶13

Arif Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2297 of 2026

¶3

Arif Khan

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Rajeev Kumar Sharma
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 84

¶7

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶8

Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶9

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer to direct the learned Special Judge (DAA)/Gangster Act Hamirpur, District Hamirpur to decide criminal misc. No. 113 of 2025, in Case Crime No.0195 of 2022 "State Vs. Shibu Khan and others" under section 16(1) of The Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities Act 1986 Police Station- Biwar, District-Hamirpur.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant apprised this Court that the applicant is in great hardship as his immovable and movable property have been confiscated vide order of the District Magistrate- Hamirpur. He further submitted that the present case is pending for quite some time and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶12

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶13

With the aforesaid the instant application finally stands disposed of.

¶14

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶15

May 7, 2026 Saurabh

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Arif Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arif Khan v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dhanveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chakradhari Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Bhanu Priya Dubey Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Karmveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhanveer Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Krishna Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and Another