Din Dayal and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Din Dayal and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Application under Section 528 BNSS/Section 482 CrPC finally disposed of with directions: parties to appear before the trial court and move a compromise application; trial court to pass appropriate orders within one week of such filing; mediation centre to conclude mediation within four months; all further proceedings against the applicants in Case No. 1693/2025 stayed for six months; liberty to approach the High Court with the mediation report if mediation succeeds.

Issue for consideration

Whether the application under Section 528 BNSS read with Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the summoning/warrant order dated 25.02.2026 in Case No. 1693/2025 under Sections 351(2)/352 BNS should be disposed of by referring the parties to the mediation/compromise process of the court below.

Court's answer

Both parties were directed to appear before the trial court and file an application for disposal of the case on the basis of compromise; if such an application is filed, the trial court shall pass appropriate orders thereon within one week of the date of filing, and the concerned mediation centre shall conclude the mediation within four months.

Ratio / Principle

All further proceedings against the applicants in the said case shall remain stayed for six months from the date of the order.

Key takeaways

Clarified that if the mediation between the parties fails, the trial court shall be free to proceed against the applicants in accordance with law in the said case; and if the mediation succeeds, the applicants shall be free to approach this Court along with the report of the mediation centre.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J., Court No. 82), order dated May 6, 2026, in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 16478 of 2026, Din Dayal and 4 others v. State of U.P. and another. The applicants moved the Court under Section 528 BNSS read with Section 482 CrPC to quash the summoning/warrant order dated 25.02.2026 passed by the Additional Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Duddhi, Sonbhadra in Case No. 1693/2025 under Sections 351(2)/352 BNS. Counsel for the applicants stated that a compromise (sulah) between the parties was likely and sought reference of the matter to the mediation centre of the court below; the learned AGA had no objection. The Court directed both parties to appear before the trial court and file an application for disposal of the case on the basis of compromise; on such filing, the trial court was to pass appropriate orders within one week, and the mediation centre was to conclude the process within four months. All further proceedings against the applicants in the said case were stayed for six months. The Court clarified that on failure of mediation the trial court would be free to proceed in accordance with law, and on success the applicants could approach the High Court with the mediation centre's report. The application was finally disposed of in these terms.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 16478 of 2026

Din Dayal And 4 Others

.....Applicant(s)

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjani Kumar, Ashok Kumar Gautam, Dilip Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 82

HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

आवेदकगण की ओर से धारा 528 बी.एन.एस.एस /धारा 482 दं०्ऺ०सं० के अन्तगर्त यह आवेदन प्ऴ , वाद. सं० 1693/2025, अन्तगर्त धारा 351(2)/ 352 बी.एऩ.एस. थाना िवण़्ामगंज, िजला सोनभ्श में एिडशनल जज (जू.िड.)/जूडीिसयल मिजस ् ेट, दु़डी. सोनभ्श, ्षारा पािरत ्ऺसं्ञान/तलबी आदेश िदनांक 25.02.2026 को अपास्त करने के उ्देश्य से योिजत िकया गया है।

आवेदकगण के िव्षान अिधव्वा एवं िव्षान अपर शासकीय अिधव्वा को सुना तथा प्ऴावली का पिरशीलन िकया।

आवेदकगण के िव्षान अिधव्वा का कथन है िक इस ्ऺकरण में प्षकारों के मध्य सुलह समझौता हो जाने की संभावना है. इसिलए इस ्ऺकरण को संबंिधत अवर न्यायालय के सुलह समझौता केन ् को रेफर कर िदया जाय।

िव्षान अपर शासकीय अिधव्वा को उनका यह अनुरोध स्वीकार िकए जाने में कोई आपि्त नहीं है।

मामले के तथ्यों एवं पिरिस्थितयों के दृि्िगत इस ्ऺकरण में यह िनदरॏिशत िकया जाता है िक दोनों प्षकार संबंिधत अवर न्यायालय के सम्ष उपिस्थत होकर मामले को सुलह सम्झौता के ्ष ारा िनस्तािरत करने के िलए आवेदन प्ऴ ्ऺस्तुत करें। यिद ्ऺकरण को सुलह समझौता के आधार पर िनस्तािरत करने के संबंध में आवेदन प्ऴ अबर न्यायालय के सम्ष ्ऺस्तुत िकया जाता है ती संबंिधत न्यायालय ्षारा आवेदन प्ऴ ्ऺस्तुत िकए जाने की ितिथ से एक सप्ताह के अन्दर उस पर उिचत आदेश पािरत िकया जाय तथा संबंिधत मीिडऐशन सेन्टर ्षारा उसे 4 माह के अन्दर िनस्तािरत कर िदया जाय।

आज से 6 माह तक आवेदकगण के िवरू्ध उपरो्व वाद में समस्त अि्षम कायर्वाही स्थिगत रहेगी।

यहाँ पर यह स्प्ि िकया जाता है िक यिद प्षकारों के मध्य उ्व मीिडऐशन की ्ऺि्वया िवफल होती है तो संबंिधत अवर न्यायालय उपरो्व वाद में आवेदकगण के िवरु्ध िनयमानुसार िविधक कायर्वाही करने को स्वतं्ऴ है. और यिद प्षकारों के मध्य उ्व मीिडऐशन की ्ऺिकया सफल होती है तो आवेदकगण मीिडऐशन सेन्टर की उस आख्या के साथ इस न्यायालय में आने को स्वतं्ऴ है।

उपरो्व अभ्युि्व के साथ धारा 528 बी.एन.एस.एस/धारा 482 दे०्ऺ०सं० के अन्तगर्त ्ऺस्तुत

NA528 No. 16478 of 2026

2

िकया गया यह आवेदन प्ऴ अिन्तम रूप से िनस्तािरत िकया जाता है।

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)

May 6, 2026

S.Mishra

Digitally signed by :- SHASHI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad