Dismissed¶12

Smt. Nanki Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC5 May 2026NA528/15925/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Smt. Nanki Devi and another v. State of U.P. and 2 others; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 15925 of 2026; quashing of revisional order dated 21.02.2026 in Criminal Revision No. 22 of 2024 (Smt. Nisha Devi Vs. State and others); setting aside of magistrate's order dated 22.12.2023 rejecting complaint; direction for fresh order after hearing; no illegality or infirmity found; application dismissed by Dr. Gautam Chowdhary, J. on May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

There is no illegality, impropriety or infirmity in the impugned revisional order dated 21.02.2026; it has been passed in correct perspective. ¶10

Smt. Nanki Devi and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 15925 of 2026

¶2

Smt. Nanki Devi And Another

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
Counsel for Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others	:	Shyam Narayan Verma .....O P
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.

¶5

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶6

Court No. - 82

¶7

HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶9

This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed for quashing of the order dated 21.02.2026 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Court No. 1, Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Revision No. 22 of 2024 (Smt. Nisha Devi Vs. State and others), whereby the revision filed by the opposite party No. 2 was allowed by the court of Sessions while rejecting the order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, rejecting the complaint filed by the opposite party No. 2.

¶10

On perusal of the record, the Court finds that on the complaint filed by the opposite party No. 2 to summon the accused-applicants to face the trial was rejected by the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, which order was challenged by the opposite party No. 2 before the revisional court, who vide its impugned order allowed the said revision while rejecting the order of the concerned trial court directed the court consider to pass fresh order in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties. Thus, there appears no illegality, impropriety or infirmity in the impugned order and same has been passed in correct perspective.

¶11

The application has no merit and is liable to be dismissed.

¶12

Dismissed accordingly.

¶13

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)

¶14

May 5, 2026

¶15

Mustaqeem.

¶16

Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Nanki Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Nanki Devi and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Kalika Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Santosh Kumar and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ajay Chahar Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sumit Kumar Pandey and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Pankaj Bajpai vs State of U.P. and 2 Others