Udit Narain v. Vinay Kumar and 2 Others

Allahabad HC19 Mar 2026A227/3474/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Matters Under Article 227 No. 3474 of 2026, decided 19.03.2026 by Manish Kumar Nigam, J. Mandamus sought for speedy disposal of interlocutory application dated 03.08.2023 in O.S. No. 105 of 2023 before Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar. Petition disposed of with six-month timeline direction; expedited trial disposal; no adjournments; service and hearing safeguards.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to consider and decide the application dated 03.08.2023 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within six months, subject to service, hearing, and no unnecessary adjournments. ¶¶15

Udit Narain vs Vinay Kumar and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3474 of 2026

Udit Narain

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Vinay Kumar And 2 Others

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Deo Ojha
Counsel for Respondent(s) :

¶8

Court No. - 5

¶9

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

¶11

The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:

¶12

" i) Issue an order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the court below / Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to decide the application 21C dated 03.08.2023 filed by the petitioner in Original Suit No. 105 of 2023 (Vinay Kumar vs. Pooja Chowdhar and others) expeditiously by concluding day by day hearing within stipulated period. (Annexure No.2) to the petition."

¶13

Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that application dated 03.08.2023 is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.

¶14

In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

¶15

Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Muzaffar Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.

¶16

March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri.

¶17

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Udit Narain v. Vinay Kumar and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Udit Narain v. Vinay Kumar and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd Laik and 2 Others Vs Mohd Jahid

Rajat Agarwal Vs Kunj Bihari Agarwal and 5 Other

Wakeel Ahmad and Another Vs Azhar Ali

Parvej Alam vs Smt. Mahe Aasmin

Sushil Kumar Malviya and 8 Others vs Sharda Prasad and 6 Others

Neebar @ Sudama vs Amreesh