Disposed¶15

Parvej Alam v. Smt. Mahe Aasmin

Allahabad HC19 Mar 2026A227/3460/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious disposal direction under Article 227; Case No. 290 of 2024 (Parvej Alam vs. Smt. Mahe Aasmin) before Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia; direction to decide within eighteen months of production of certified copy, subject to no legal impediment; Allahabad High Court; Manish Kumar Nigam, J.; March 19, 2026; speedy disposal, family court delay, timely justice.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia to decide Case No. 290 of 2024 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, after hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence, provided there is no other legal impediment. ¶15

Parvej Alam vs Smt. Mahe Aasmin — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether a direction should be issued for early disposal of Case No. 290 of 2024 (Parvej Alam vs. Smt. Mahe Aasmin), pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia, within a stipulated period.

¶12

Court's answer

The petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia, to decide Case No. 290 of 2024 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, after hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

The direction was issued without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and is subject to there being no other legal impediment.

¶15

Key takeaways

No useful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.), by order dated March 19, 2026, disposed of a petition under Article 227 filed by Parvej Alam seeking early disposal of Case No. 290 of 2024 (Parvej Alam vs. Smt. Mahe Aasmin), pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia. Noting from the order sheet that several dates had been fixed without the case being decided, and that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending, the Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits, directed the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia to decide Case No. 290 of 2024 in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, after hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence, provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3460 of 2026

Parvej Alam

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

Smt. Mahe Aasmin	.....Responden
Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Jay Prakash Gupta, Sunil Kumar Singh :

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Court No. - 5

¶8

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

¶10

The present petition has been filed for the following relief:

¶11

"To issue direction for early disposal of the Case No. 290 of 2024 (Parvej Alam vs. Smt. Mahe Aasmin), pending before the learned court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia, within stipulated period."

¶12

Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid case is pending since 2024 and he prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶13

From perusal of the order sheet, annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the petition, it appears that several dates have been fixed by the Court concerned, however, till date, the aforesaid case has not been decided.

¶14

No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to Principal Judge, Family Court, Ballia, to decide the Case No. 290 of 2024, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of eighteen months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after hearing all the concerned parties and giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment.

¶16

March 19, 2026 Nitika Sri.

¶17

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parvej Alam v. Smt. Mahe Aasmin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvej Alam v. Smt. Mahe Aasmin

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohd Laik and 2 Others Vs Mohd Jahid

Rajat Agarwal Vs Kunj Bihari Agarwal and 5 Other

Wakeel Ahmad and Another Vs Azhar Ali

Udit Narain vs Vinay Kumar and 2 Others

Sushil Kumar Malviya and 8 Others vs Sharda Prasad and 6 Others

Neebar @ Sudama vs Amreesh