The petition challenging land construction on the petitioner's property, carried out pursuant to directions in a related PIL, was disposed of with liberty to approach the PIL Bench via an appropriate application.
Liberty granted to approach the PIL Bench by filing an appropriate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 41055 of 2025
Sushila Devi
| Versus | .....Petitioner(s) | |
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others | .....Respondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Anil Kumar Singh |
Tiwari, Rajesh |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
|
| Court No.- 35 |
(SL No.33)
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
WRIC No. 41055 of 2025
2
before the appropriate Bench trying the Public Interest Litigation by way of IA.
November 21, 2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner’s grievance regarding land construction under court directions is maintainable in the present writ petition or requires approach before the PIL Bench.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ratnesh Dwivedi vs. State of U.P. and 8 OthersReferred¶9
Public Interest Litigation No. 1051 of 2022 (Ratnesh Dwivedi vs. State of U.P. and 8 Others)
Sushila Devi
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Atul Sreedharan
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
