Contractor sought payment for works executed for the State. State admitted liability of Rs.4,04,000/-. Court disposed of the petition directing payment within four weeks, with a chart explaining the admitted amount, leaving the balance to alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37177 of 2025
Kanchhi Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others
.....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Tiwari, Ramesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
November 19, 2025 rkg
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State should be directed to pay the admitted dues of Rs.4,04,000/- to a contractor for works executed.
Kanchhi Singh
State Of U.P.
Atul Sreedharan
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
