Writ petition seeking protection of petitioner's plot from alleged forcible possession by private respondents, despite a pending civil suit with an interim order. The Court found the averments speculative and held the remedy lay before the civil trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 37189 of 2025
Bachccha Lal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 14 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Mool Chandra |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C. |
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
November 19, 2025 rkg
(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition lies for protection of property when a civil suit with ad interim injunction is already pending.
Bachccha Lal
State Of U.P.
Respondent Nos. 7 and 8 (private respondents)
Atul Sreedharan
Anish Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
