Raj Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Mandamus against Forest Department interference refused; demarcation route mandated. Keywords: Article 226; writ of mandamus; Forest Department interference; land adjacent/adjoining forest land; demarcation; Section 67 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; Section 24 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; miscellaneous application prescribed format; Revenue Authority; plot no.652; 0.046 hectare; village Challesar Etmadpur; District Agra; Raj Kumar v. State of U.P.; WRIT-C 30445 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; Ajit Kumar J.; Swarupama Chaturvedi J.; petition consigned to records; decided October 9, 2025.
What did the court decide?
No writ of mandamus issued; subject to the observations and directions, the petition was consigned to records, with the petitioner directed to seek demarcation before the appropriate forum under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and liberty to move a miscellaneous application under Section 24 thereof.