Dismissed¶12

Anees Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC7 Oct 2025WRIC/33572/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition — WRIT - C No. 33572 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 4 — Bench: Hon'ble Ajit Kumar, J. and Hon'ble Swarupama Chaturvedi, J. — Order dated October 8, 2025 — Anees Ahmad v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others — Counsel: Manoj Kumar Gautam for petitioner; C.S.C. for respondents — Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on behalf of the registered Society; purely procedural order, no merits, statutes, precedents or quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh petition on behalf of the registered Society. ¶12

Anees Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - C No. - 33572 of 2025

Anees Ahmad

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Manoj Kumar Gautam .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C.S.C.

¶8

Court No. - 4

¶9

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.

¶10

After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh on behalf of the registered Society.

¶11

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the above.

¶12

In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

¶13

(Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

¶14

October 8, 2025 IrfanUddin

¶15

Digitally signed by :- IRFAN UDDIN SIDDIKI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anees Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anees Ahmad v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases