Petitioner sought enforcement of an award dated 03.12.2008 along with regularization and pay benefits. The court found no good cause disclosed for the delay in approaching it and dismissed the writ petition on grounds of delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:8970
Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 562 of 2025
Petitioner :- Mangala Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadhesh Prasad,Radhey Shyam Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Abhishek Srivastava,C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Shri Awadhesh Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Kritika Sinha, Advocate holding brief of Shri Abhishek Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no.2, Shri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 3 & 4.
The petitioner by means of this writ petition seeks enforcement of award dated 03.12.2008 and consequential reliefs like regularization of services and pay benefits.
No good cause for delay has been disclosed. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed on the ground of delay and laches.
Order Date :- 20.1.2025
C. MANI
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking enforcement of an industrial award and regularization could proceed despite unexplained delay?
Mangala Prasad
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
