Smt. Savitri v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought benefit of the assured career progression scheme; representation unanswered. Court, without deciding merits, directed respondent no. 2 to decide the claim as per law within three months and disposed of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent no. 2 to decide ACP claim as per law within three months.