Writ petition under Article 226 sought re-appointment as Assistant Teacher. After the State relied on earlier orders, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw; the writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 15878 of 2025
Pramod Kumar Singh
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others
.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upasna Verma, Vaishali Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No. - 2
HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
(Prakash Padia,J.)
November 13, 2025
T.S.
Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents could be directed to re-appoint the petitioner as Assistant Teacher in the institution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pramod Kumar Singh
State of Uttar Pradesh
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
