Ramu Sankhla v. Pratham Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Thru. Its Authorised Sign. Namely Mr. Subhash Chandra
Case brief
What is this about?
RERA Appeal No. 162 of 2025; Ramu Sankhla (appellant) versus Pratham Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. through authorised signatory Mr. Subhash Chandra (sole respondent); High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 19; Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.; order dated October 30, 2025. Interim/administrative order: appearance of counsel Shri Siddharth noted for the respondent; two weeks' time granted to file objections and Vakalatnama; no further time to be granted; matter listed as fresh on 17.11.2025. Counsel for appellant: Suryansh Narula. No statute, precedent, issue, quantum, or merits holding recorded in this order.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks' time granted to the respondent's counsel to file objections and Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent, with a direction that no further time shall be granted; matter to be put up as fresh on 17.11.2025. No substantive relief on the merits was granted or denied in this interim order.