Application sought expeditious disposal of a pending Section 125 CrPC maintenance case. A status report showed parties negotiating a possible compromise and an adjournment moved by the applicant. Finding no need for a direction, the Court disposed of the application with observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 621 of 2025
Smt. Neha Sharma And 2 Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shashank Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 87
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
November 18, 2025/SK
Digitally signed by :- SUSHEEL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Family Court to decide the pending maintenance case under Section 125 CrPC expeditiously.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Neha Sharma And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Another
Anil Kumar-X
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
