Informant of a decade-old pending case under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act sought a direction for speedy trial as no witnesses had been examined. The High Court directed the trial court to decide the case within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 626 of 2025
Smt. Pooja
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 2 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Dileep Kumar |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 87
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
October 14, 2025 SK
Digitally signed by :- SUSHEEL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court should be directed to decide the pending 2015 criminal case expeditiously.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt. Pooja
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar-X
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
