Informant sought a direction for speedy disposal of a pending trial under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging delay tactics by the accused. The court directed expeditious disposal within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4190 of 2025
Smt. Kulsum Alias Sabina Bano
.....Applicant(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Mishra |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. |
Court No. - 87
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
(Anil Kumar-X,J.)
November 10, 2025 SK
Digitally signed by :- SUSHEEL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Should the trial court be directed to decide the pending criminal case expeditiously?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Kulsum Alias Sabina Bano
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar-X
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
