Disposed¶12

Chandrabhan Prajapati v. State of U.P. through Its Principal Secretary Department U.P. at Lucknow and Another

Allahabad HC6 Nov 2025NA529/4030/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 529 BNSS application; expeditious disposal / speedy trial direction to trial court; pending Section 138 N.I. Act cheque-dishonour complaint; Case No. 845 of 2012; Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli; three-month outer preference from delivery of certified copy; no legal impediment condition; applicant-complainant Chandrabhan Prajapati; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; decided November 6, 2025; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the concerned trial court (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli) to decide Case No. 845 of 2012 under Section 138 N.I. Act expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, provided there is no legal impediment. ¶12

Chandrabhan Prajapati vs State of U.P. through Its… — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4030 of 2025

¶3

Chandrabhan Prajapati

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Through Its Princip U.P. At Lucknow And Another	al Secretary Department	....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Brijesh Kumar Praja Maheshwari Prasad Kumar Singh	pati, Sriv	Mahesh Kumar, astava, Surendra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 87

¶8

HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is a complainant in Case No. 845 of 2012, Computer No. UPCD040002262012 (Chandrabhan Prajapti Vs. Vimal Pal @ Vimlesh Kumar) Under Section 138 N.I. Act which is pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli. No substantial progress has been made till date in the said complaint case. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the learned trial court to decide the said case as expeditiously as possible.

¶11

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the concerned trial court is directed to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions/observations, the application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of .

¶13

(Anil Kumar-X,J.)

¶14

November 6, 2025 SK

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SUSHEEL KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrabhan Prajapati v. State of U.P. through Its Principal Secretary Department U.P. at Lucknow and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrabhan Prajapati v. State of U.P. through Its Principal Secretary Department U.P. at Lucknow and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saddam Husain Vs State of U.P. and Another

Raj @ Kallan vs State of U.P. and Another

Komal Alias Kapil Raikwar vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendr Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Ujma vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

M/S Beena Steels vs State of U.P. and 4 Others