Revision concerning bail of a juvenile; counsel stated the Juvenile Court had already acquitted the revisionist, rendering the revision infructuous. The High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 963 of 2023
Juvenile X Thru. His Father
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Bhola Singh Patel, Pravin Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Beant Singh
Court No. - 11
HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
Learned Counsel for the revisionist states that Juvenile Court has already passed the order of acquittal with regard to the revisionist and the present revision relates to seeking bail and as such, the present revision has now become infructuous.
Taking note of the statement of learned Counsel for the revisionist, the present revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Saurabh Lavania,J.)
August 25, 2025
Jyoti/-
Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Juvenile X Thru. His Father
State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko.
Beant Singh
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
