The revisional application seeking enlargement on bail was dismissed as having lost efficacy due to efflux of time.
Revision dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49262
Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 286 of 2022 Revisionist :- Rajan (Delinquent Juvenile) Thru. Mother Kamla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sushil Kumar Misra,Vishal Nigam,Vishnu Kant Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Lalit Kumari,Ran Vijay Yadav
Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.
Sri Sushil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present revision, which relates to enlargement of revisionist on bail, has lost its efficacy due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, this revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. Order Date :- 22.8.2025
Jyoti/-
Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Rajan
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Lavania
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
