Geeshan Warsi @ Shanu v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal of a criminal revision for want of prosecution where the revisionist failed to deposit Rs. 50,000/- directed by the Court and was unreachable by his own counsel; interim orders, if any, vacated. Parties: Geeshan Warsi @ Shanu (revisionist) v. State of U.P. thru. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 others. Court: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 12; single judge Rajnish Kumar, J.; order dated 29.7.2025; counsel: Narendra Gupta (Alok Mishra holding brief) for revisionist, G.A. for opposite party. No statute or precedent cited; impugned order not identified in the order.
What did the court decide?
Since the revisionist neither deposited the amount directed by the Court nor could be contacted by his counsel, it appears that the revisionist does not want to press this revision. ¶7