Indal vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30722 of 2025

Indal

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Raj Kumar Sharma, Sunil Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 69

¶6

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 151 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 308 IPC, Police Station- Mangalpur, District Kanpur Dehat.

¶9

Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the victim received only one grievous injury i.e. fracture of the zygomatic arch as well as fracture on maxillary antrum just below the eyes adjacent to the nose. It is further submitted that even the injured assigned the role of causing that injuries by one blow on the part of the present applicant. Therefore, bare perusal of statement of injured as well as injury report clearly shows that the case would at most fall under Section 325 IPC and not under Section 308 IPC. It is further submitted that even the offence mentioned in the charge sheet are punishable upto 7 years. He further submitted that charge sheet has been filed by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has explained the criminal history of one case and he is languishing in jail since 03.03.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings.

¶10

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶11

BAIL No. 30722 of 2025

¶12

2

¶13

Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶14

Let the applicant- Indal involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:-

¶15

i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶17

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶18

iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶21

It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of downloaded copy of this order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days.

¶22

It is directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant.

¶23

BAIL No. 30722 of 2025

¶24

3

¶25

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through concerned Jail Superintendent via e-mail or e-prison portal in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 .

¶26

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.)

¶27

November 6, 2025 A.Kr.

¶28

Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Priyanshu Yadav @ Amrit Yadav vs State of U.P.

Sanju @ Sanjeev vs State of U.P.

Kundan Yadav Alias Ankit Yadav vs State of U.P.

Karimulla @ Kareem vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ayodhya and Others

Vaibhav Singh vs State of U.P.

Chand Babu vs State of U.P.