This is a procedural order listing a writ petition and directing respondents to file counter affidavits. It contains no substantive legal discussion, findings, or disposition of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
WRIT - B No. - 900 of 2025
Karimulla @ Kareem
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
| Deputy Director Of Consolid Others |
ation, Ayodhya And | .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) |
: Rakesh Pathak, : C.S.C., Mohan Irfan |
Vijay Pathak Singh, Mohd Wajid |
Court No. - 30
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
Heard Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1, Sri Mohd Wajid Irfan, learned counsel for Respondents No.2 and 3 and Sri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for Respondent No.4.
Let counter affidavit be filed by the Respondents No. 2 and 3, within six weeks.
List this matter after six weeks.
It is made clear that pendency of this writ petition shall not be treated as any kind of interim order passed by this Court in favour of the petitioner.
(Manjive Shukla,J.)
September 16, 2025
Shahnaz
Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Karimulla @ Kareem
Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Ayodhya And Others
Manjive Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
