Allowed

Kishanpal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC3 Sept 2025BAIL/30173/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under BNS, POCSO and SC/ST Act provisions; counsel argued the victim turned hostile at trial. Court allowed bail subject to conditions including no tampering with evidence and appearance before trial court.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail on personal bond and two heavy local sureties, subject to standard conditions including no tampering or intimidation of witnesses.

Kishanpal vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Caste Atrocities | Allahabad HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30173 of 2025

¶3

Kishanpal

¶4

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State Of U.P. And 3 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manvendra Singh, Pushpa Joshi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 65

¶6

HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶8

It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that by the efflux of time, trial began and during the trial, the statement of P.W. 2-victim was recorded and she has not supported the prosecution version, copy of statement is annexed as Annexure-SA1 to the supplementary affidavit, which has been filed today in the Court, is taken on record. He thus submits that no offence against the applicant is made out. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 01.06.2025.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence.

¶10

BAIL No. 30173 of 2025

¶11

¶12

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence, and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Hence the bail application is allowed.

¶13

Let applicant Kishanpal involved in Case Crime No.188 of 2025 under Sections 65(1) of B.N.S., and Section 3/4 (2) of POCSO Act, and Section 3 (2)5 SC/ST Act, Police Station Bilsi, District Badaun, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶14

A. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.

¶15

B. The applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶16

C. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.

¶17

D. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is an accused, or suspected, of the commission of he is suspected.

¶18

E. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law.

¶20

(Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.)

¶21

November 18, 2025 S.Ali

¶22

Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kishanpal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishanpal v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ram Shankar Verma vs State of U.P. and Another

Ravindra Tevatiya vs State of U.P. and Another

Shailendra Yadav @ Neetu vs State of U.P.

Sabir and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Nand Kumar Alias Nandlal vs State of U.P.

Aurangjeb and Another vs State of U.P.