Vivek Maheshwari v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC adjourned as counsel for the applicant was absent when the case was called out; listed after three weeks with directions for the State to obtain instructions.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 330 of 2025
Vivek Maheshwari
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Devesh Kumar Shukla |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 69 |
HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.
Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the applicant is not present.
Place this case after three weeks. In the meantime, learned A.G.A. for the State may also obtain instructions.
(Vivek Varma,J.)
September 19, 2025
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vivek Maheshwari
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/330/2025
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court