Indresh Kiraula and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Quashing of non-bailable warrants and proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C.; Application U/S 482 allowed; absence from trial attributed to communication gap with counsel during Corona period despite prior grant of bail; applicants undertook to appear and were directed to appear within one month with regular attendance thereafter and consequences of default; Case No. 81 of 2002 (State Vs. Shriram Yadav and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 190 of 2001 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Ghazipur, District Lucknow; Chief Judicial Magistrate, Custom, Lucknow; Indresh Kiraula and others v. State of U.P.
What did the court decide?
Application U/S 482 allowed; Non Bailable Warrants dated 09.09.2021, order dated 31.05.2025 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Custom, Lucknow, and proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. quashed, with directions to the applicants to appear before the trial court within one month and regularly thereafter, failing which the trial court may proceed in accordance with law including coercive measures.