Sonu Sonkar v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC; court granted two weeks to file supplementary affidavit, listed after four weeks, and extended the interim order till next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6540 of 2024
Sonu Sonkar
.....Applicant(s)
Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bed Kant Mishra, Pawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J.
- Heard Sri Bed Kant Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P.-opposite party no.1 and perused the record.
- Learned counsel for the applicant prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file supplementary affidavit.
- List after four weeks.
- Interim order, passed earlier, is extended till the next date of listing.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sonu Sonkar
- respondent
State of U.P.
- respondent
Another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/6540/2024
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Padam Narain Mishra
- Order 2 — this page · Padam Narain Mishra
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court