Disposed¶12

Sarvar Alam v. State of U.P. Thru. Home Secy.Lko. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC2 Jan 2025A482/11649/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 482 CrPC application challenging chargesheet under Section 354 IPC; liberty to file bail and discharge applications; direction for expeditious disposal per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines; police restrained from coercive action for 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file bail application and discharge application before the trial court; direction to police not to take coercive action for 30 days or until bail application filed ¶12

Sarvar Alam Vs State of U.P. Thru. Home Secy.Lko. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:6

¶2

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11649 of 2024 Applicant :- Sarvar Alam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Home Secy.Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Lalit Mohan Joshi,Shubhra Sahai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record.

¶5

The present application has been filed for the following main relief:-

¶6

" ययाचच / अभभिययक्त ककी ओर ससे सयादर पपूररक भनिरसेदनि भनिम्नि प्रकयार ह ह ययाभचकया कसे सयाथ ससंलभग्नित शपथ - पत्र मम रभररत तथ्यय , कयाररय एरसं पररससथभतयय कको दृभष्टिगत रखतसे हहयसे मयानिनिचय न्ययाययालय ससे सयादर पपूररक प्रयाथरनिया हह भक भरपकच ससं० -2 रयादच मयकदमया दयारया भदनियासंक 21.04.2022 कको दरर प्र०सपू०रर० कसे आधयार पर भरपकच ससं० 3 दयारया ययाचच कसे भररुद्ध अपर मयख्य न्ययाभयक मजरसट ट से चतयथर , कक ससं० 28, रनिपद लखनिऊ मम मय०असं०ससं 65/2022 अ० धयारया 354 भिया०द०ससं० कसे तहत थयानिया भरकयास निगर लखनिऊ मम भदनियासंक 21.04.2022 कको दयाजखल आरकोप पत्र ससंख्यया 01/2022 कको भरखसणण्डित करनिसे हसेतय उभचत आदसेश पयाररत करनिसे ककी ककपया करम तथया उपरकोक्त ययाभचकया कसे भनिरर्णीत हकोनिसे तक भरदयानिन भरचयारर न्ययाययालय कसे समक लसम्म्बित उपरकोक्त मयकदमसे मम अभग्रिम कयाय र याहच करनिसे ककी ककपया करम। "

¶7

After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351: (2022) 10 SCC 51 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously.

¶8

Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicants apply for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶10

Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶11

Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observation made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶12

With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.

¶13

Order Date :- 2.1.2025

¶14

Jyoti/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sarvar Alam v. State of U.P. Thru. Home Secy.Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarvar Alam v. State of U.P. Thru. Home Secy.Lko. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Avinash Pratap Singh and Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Ram Rasik Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and Ors.

Parmeshwar Deen Verma Vs State of U.P Thru Prin Secy Home Lko and Ors.

Chakravardhan Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Anoop Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Subhash Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and Another