Sarwati v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lucknow and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Default dismissal for want of prosecution; Article 227 petition (No. 4443 of 2024); petitioner Sarwati unrepresented at hearing; counsel Shiv Kumar Yadav and Prem Kumar Verma for petitioner, C.S.C. for State of U.P. (Revenue Department) respondents; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 7; single judge Pankat Bhatia corrected to Pankaj Bhatia; order dated 18.7.2025; no substantive adjudication, no impugned order discussed, no costs or amounts.
What did the court decide?
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared for the petitioner even in the revised call. ¶7