The writ petition filed by Himmat Ali and others against the State of U.P. was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners did not appear to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8057 of 2024
Petitioner :- Himmat Ali And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
Case called out.
None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition. Counsel for the State is present.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.]
Order Date :- 17.10.2024 Santosh/-
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Himmat Ali And 2 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 5 Others
Rajan Roy
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
