Short order noting that the petitioner appears as a custodian of enemy property who has gone abroad. No substantive legal decision was rendered.
The case involves a petitioner, Vikram Capoor, who is the custodian of enemy property and has gone abroad. The petitioner sought to seek instructions from Senior Counsel. As no hearing took place, no order on the merits was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8908 of 2024
Petitioner :- Vikram Capoor Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Home Affairs And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Apoorva Tewari,Akriti Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
Custodian of enemy property has gone abroad.
Sri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate, ASGI, assisted by Sri Dipanshu Das, Advocate, says that he will have to seek instructions in the matter from him.
List/put up on 28.11.2024, as fresh.
[Shree Prakash Singh,J.] [Rajan Roy,J.]
Order Date :- 22.11.2024 kkv/
Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Vikram Capoor
Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Home Affairs And 2 Others
Rajan Roy
Shree Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
