A petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain respondents from interfering in his fisheries business over a leased pond and to direct the State to decide a pending application regarding the lease dispute. The court listed the matter for fresh hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 3
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7769 of 2024
Petitioner :- Shyam Kishore Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
" i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opp. party No. 2 & 3 restrain to the opp. party No.4 did not interfere in the fisheries business and peaceful possession over the gata No. 246/0.7090 in the interest of justice.
ii) Issue a writ of order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the opp. party No. 3 to decide pending application dated 02.09.2024 preferred by petitioner contained as Annexure No.5 to this writ petition in the interest of justice. "
business of fisheries.
Order Date :- 10.9.2024 Darpan Sharma
Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue a writ of mandamus restraining respondents from interfering in the petitioner's fisheries business.
Whether the High Court should direct the State Respondent to decide the pending application of the petitioner regarding the fishing pond lease dispute.
Shyam Kishore Maurya
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt.
Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt.
Others
Sangeeta Chandra
Brij Raj Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
