Writ petition challenging an order under Section 229-B of the U.P. Z.A & L.R Act, with maintainability questioned given available statutory remedy, was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5386 of 2024
Petitioner :- Sachchidanand And Another Respondent :- Girja Sonkar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Pratap Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
None appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition nor any illness or out of station slip has been sent by learned counsel for the petitioners.
This Court on 04.07.2024 has passed the following order, which reads as under:-
"None appears to press the petition.
However, learned Standing counsel has pointed out that the instant petition is not maintainable as the order is under challenge has been passed in exercise of powers under Section 229-B of U.P. Z.A 7 L.R Act under which the petitioners has efficacious remedy.
Since none has put in appearance, accordingly, in the interest of justice, list this matter on 11.07.2024 as fresh.
Learned counsel for the petitioners shall address the Court on the maintainability of petition. In case, none appears on the date fixed, appropriate order will be passed."
In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Consigned to records.
Order Date :- 11.7.2024 Ashutosh
Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging an order passed under Section 229-B of the U.P. Z.A & L.R Act was maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachchidanand
Girja Sonkar
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
