Matter under Article 227 was called but petitioner's counsel was absent despite prior written mention by private respondents' counsel; the court passed over the matter and listed it for a later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 8
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2922 of 2024
Petitioner :- Raja Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhinav Trivedi,Ashish Kumar Pathak
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Asit Srivastava
Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J.
Shri Asit Srivastava, learned counsel for the private-respondents had made a mention in the morning for taking up of the matter and the same was also informed to the learned counsel for the petitioner, in writing, however, at the time of call of the case, he is not present.
In the ends of justice, the matter is passed over for the day.
List on 01.08.2024.
In case if the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present on the next date, appropriate orders would be passed.
Learned counsel for the private-respondents shall inform the learned counsel for the petitioner of the order passed today, in writing.
Order Date :- 26.7.2024 Rakesh/-
Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Raja Kumar
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue U.P. Lko.
6 Others
Jaspreet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
