Petitioner challenged an ex-parte order dated 05.06.2023 passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, citing lack of notice. This court held the alternative remedy under the same section was available and dismissed the petition as not maintainable.
Petition dismissed as not maintainable due to availability of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:158780
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28606 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rudal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Bhardwaj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Order Date :- 27.9.2024 Ruhi H.
Digitally signed by :- RUHI HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is maintainable given the availability of an alternative remedy.
Rudal
State Of U.P.
Respondent no. 3 (Assistant Collector/Tehsildar)
Prakash Padia
Ruhi Hasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
