Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of a centre allotment for U.P. Board Examinations 2023-24, holding late-stage interference would cause organizational difficulties and the distance dispute is factual.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1575 of 2024
Petitioner :- Rose Tiwari Thru. Her Legal Gaurdian Vinay Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lakshmana Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
interfere in the impugned order at such a belated stage which may create organizational difficulties not only for the authorities but for petitioner herself. Even otherwise, it is only a single petitioner who has raised such objections. The dispute pertaining to distance of an Examination Centre allocated being in nature of factual aspect, this Court also refrains from entering the same.
Order Date :- 19.2.2024 kvg/-
Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere with the rejection of the petitioner's centre allotment for U.P. Board Examinations due to alleged distance discrepancy?
Whether late-stage interference in examination centre allocation would create organizational difficulties?
Rose Tiwari Thru. Her Legal Gaurdian Vinay Tiwari
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy., Secondary Education, Lucknow
Manish Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
