Peremptorily listed writ petition; petitioners absent; dismissed for lack of prosecution on 8.4.2024.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to petitioner's absence at peremptory listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:28265
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1002508 of 2006
Petitioner :- Smt. Jais Raji And Anr. Respondent :- Ivth Additional District And Session Judge Gonda And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Case called out.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners.
Sri Vikas Rai, learned Standing Counsel is present.
The case was filed in the year 2006. When the case was listed lastly on 01.04.2024, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioners and was ordered to be listed peremptorily.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 8.4.2024 Renu/-
Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Smt. Jais Raji
Ivth Additional District And Session Judge Gonda
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
