The Allahabad High Court held that writ of certiorari lacks locus standi where the petitioner fails to demonstrate prejudice from the District Judge's inaction on a pending petition, deeming a fresh application as the proper remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:28365
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3217 of 2024
Petitioner :- Haseen Bano And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 13 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Surendra Kumar Misra,Avnish Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Order Date :- 8.4.2024 Ankit
Digitally signed by :- ANKIT SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the failure of the District Judge to dispose of the petition under Section 782 of CrPC 1898 grants locus standi for a writ of certiorari.
Haseen Bano And 4 Others
State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 13 Others
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
